Dems’ Depraved Indifference on Benghazi Reaches New Lows

This should surprise no one.  In the wake of the most recent hearings on Benghazi,  the main stream media still refuses to report on  Obama and Hillary’s bungling and subsequent cover up, and the Dems are dismissing the scandal with their usual class.

Nancy Pelosi shows her ass…again.

“Diversion, subterfuge, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi,” Pelosi said, according to CBS News. “Why aren’t we talking about something else?”

‘Cause like, dude that was so two years ago’:

Former White House National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor went on Fox News on Thursday, and after host Bret Baier grilled him over the issue of the talking points used after the attack, he finally responded with, “Dude, this was like two years ago.”

Throughout the exchange, Vietor — who seemed annoyed at the line of questioning — wasn’t really able to answer Baier on various questions, telling him he “believes so” or that he didn’t remember.

“You don’t remember?” Baier asked, to which Vietor responded, “Dude, this was like two years ago. We’re still talking about the most mundane process … we’re talking about the process of editing talking points. That’s what bureaucrats do all day long.”

Covering Obama’s ass:

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed last summer by Judicial Watch, the Obama administration last week released 41 documents related to the attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. An email from the deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, has received most of the attention. In it, Rhodes laid out four goals for Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, who would be appearing on five Sunday talk shows 36 hours later. “To convey that the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad; To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy; To show that we will be resolute in bringing people who harm Americans to justice, and standing steadfast through these protests; To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.”

The SCOAMF-in-Chief was ‘somewhere in the White House’, but not in the situation room as the propaganda would have you believe:

BRET BAIER: People on the ground testified that they knew where the ambassador was, that they were military in their precision. It was not guys coming to protest. They had mortars and heavy weapons.

TOMMY VIETOR: Bret, a couple of things. I was in the Situation Room that night, okay. We didn’t know where the ambassador was definitively.

BAIER: Was the president in the Situation Room?

VIETOR: No. And the fact that your network at one time reported that he watched video feed of the attack as it was ongoing is part of what I think is a pattern of inaccurate —

BAIER: Where was the president?

VIETOR: In the White House. Let me finish my initial statement. The notion that we could, you know, divine motives from a drone feed I think is wrong. And I also think this idea that the military had the capability to rescue those individuals but chose not to is I think extremely unfair to the military. And Admiral Mullen said basically the opposite.

BAIER: In the ARB report.

VIETOR: Right.

BAIER: Where was the president?

VIETOR: In the White House.

BAIER: He wasn’t in the Situation Room?

VIETOR: At what point in the evening?

BAIER: Any point in the evening.

VIETOR: It’s well known that when the attack was first briefed to him it was in the Oval Office and he was updated constantly. And during that briefing he told Tom Donilon and his Joint Chiefs and Sec Def to begin moving all military assets into the region.

BAIER: So when Hillary Clinton talks to him at 10:00 p.m., he’s where?

VIETOR: I don’t know. I don’t have a tracking device on him in the residence.

Obama denied outright an urgent request to send more security to the embassy. He lied about what he knew, and his flying monkeys tried to squelch Fox News investigative reporting surrounding the attack.

Here’s a link to a video of Fox News reporter Bret Baier reading (at about 06:45 into the video) the emails from Ambassador Stevens to the State Department, one of which is just 4 hours prior to the attack. Each one was a desperate plea for more security in the face of growing terrorist violence in the area.

Oh, and by the way, some SpecOps did make it to Benghazi, further eroding all the lies Hillary and Obama told about ‘no time or resources’ to send for help.

The blame, accountability, and responsibility rest squarely on Obama and Hillary, who showed nothing but depraved indifference from the first sign of trouble to the horrible aftermath.

Lying, spinning, denial, and cover-ups are so mundane. Especially when the blame rests squarely with a bunch of lowlifes who are more concerned with saving their own political careers than owning up to the shit they’ve done.


Related articles:

5 thoughts on “Dems’ Depraved Indifference on Benghazi Reaches New Lows”

  1. Pingback: If Trump Meets With Mueller, He Should Get the Same Considerations MB Obama’s DOJ Gave Hillary | Reclaim Our Republic

  2. SARG…
    beaurowcraps 101…they don’t give a FOOK!!!…
    WE’S FOOK’D!!!…
    luv ya long thyme sojur!!!…jc

  3. John Egbert

    Appalled – yes. Surprised – no. Just another case of SSDD for this regime. Where are the impeachments? Where are the treason trials?

Leave a Reply to Brittius Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :
Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial