Ex Obama Staffer: Biden’s ‘Malfeasance in Office’, Kickback Schemes, and Influence Peddling

Get this guy in front of Congress.

Fox News

 

A former Obama administration staffer is blowing the whistle on the Biden family’s business dealings, accusing President Biden of being involved in a “kickback scheme” in connection with his son Hunter’s overseas business dealings while he was vice president.

Mike McCormick, a stenographer for the White House for 15 years, told “Fox & Friends First” the FBI has been ignoring his alarms on the matter despite his willingness to testify under oath before the federal grand jury investigating Hunter.

“In February, I went to the FBI and filed one of their tips on their website. If you do that, and you’re lying to them, you go to jail. I’m not lying. I’m telling the truth, and I’m not going to jail,” McCormick said Thursday. “Joe Biden is a criminal. He was conducting malfeasance in office to enrich his family. Jake Sullivan is a conspirator in that, and there’s more… Obama officials involved in it, I believe.”

McCormick, who worked with Biden from 2011 to 2017, detailed a key dialogue involving the vice president, aide Jake Sullivan and the press on Air Force Two before a trip to Kyiv, Ukraine, on April 21, 2014.

Sullivan, who is the current national security adviser, outlined in a White House transcript Biden’s priorities for his trip to the country, which included U.S. investment in the Ukrainian energy sector days after Hunter joined the board of Burisma, according to the New York Post.

Months later, and well after the trip, Congress allocated $50 million to Ukraine’s energy market.

“I’m sitting back there with a tape recorder. Jake Sullivan comes back and somebody asks about fracking. His answer is, well, we’re bringing a lot of American assistance over for fracking. Burisma was the direct beneficiary of that fracking, and that’s what I recorded, and that’s in a White House transcript,” McCormick said.

“In the transcript, you don’t know who Jake Sullivan is. It’s a senior administration official. I’m the witness that says Jake Sullivan is the guy who said it and he should be investigated because at the time Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma and Joe Biden is bringing American taxpayer money to enrich that company and himself and his family,” he continued.

Hunter joined the board of the Ukrainian natural gas firm on April 18, just three days before Biden and his team traveled to Kyiv. But that critical piece of the puzzle was not made public until May 12.

McCormick argued the timeline of the events suggests that Biden funneled American money overseas to “enrich” himself and his family, and used his own influence to aid his son’s rookie energy career.

The former stenographer made it clear he wants to present the information under oath before the grand jury in Delaware probing Hunter’s business dealings, which is led by U.S. Attorney David Weiss.

Hunter has been under federal investigation since 2018 for suspected tax and foreign lobbying violations.

The probe into Hunter’s alleged violations began after suspicious activity reports (SARs) regarding suspicious foreign transactions were flagged.

Those SARs involved money funneled from “China and other foreign nations,” according to sources familiar with the probe.

And although reports suggested in months past that the investigation is approaching a critical juncture, Republican subpoena power is likely to accelerate the investigation.

McCormick argued the information he has incriminates Biden, and likely more officials he worked with, in connection with the alleged influence peddling scandal.

“If I went in there, I would tell them to have Barack Obama called in as a witness because he’s part of the conspiracy. He’s an ex-president. He has to answer who was in charge of this, putting Joe Biden into this role? Did Barack Obama know about it?” McCormick questioned.

 

Biden’s strong-arm bribery not only abetted his son but also helped Burisma get influence in the government.

He abused his position as Vice President to pull off this shit.  The DOJ should have snagged his ass for this and charged him with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (15 USC 78dd-1):

It is illegal for a person to coerce or influence, through bribery or extortion, a foreign nation into taking action that might financially benefit that person, his family or business.

Or these:

Bribery (18 USC 201(b)):

Whoever—
(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—
(A) to influence any official act; or
(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;
(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:
(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;
(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;
(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;
(4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

 

Gratuities (18 USC 201 (c)):

Whoever—
(A) directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;
(2) directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;
(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

 

Hobbs Act Extortion (18 USC 1951):

(a) Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(b) As used in this section—
(1) The term “robbery” means the unlawful taking or obtaining of personal property from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of actual or threatened force, or violence, or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his person or property, or property in his custody or possession, or the person or property of a relative or member of his family or of anyone in his company at the time of the taking or obtaining.
(2) The term “extortion” means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.
(3) The term “commerce” means commerce within the District of Columbia, or any Territory or Possession of the United States; all commerce between any point in a State, Territory, Possession, or the District of Columbia and any point outside thereof; all commerce between points within the same State through any place outside such State; and all other commerce over which the United States has jurisdiction.

And this:  Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (i.e., 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 and 1957)

Biden demanded that the prosecutor investigating the company that employed his son Hunter, be fired or Ukraine would not receive 1 billion dollars in aid.

The Bidens have been making elicit deals since Joe Biden was VP. An investment firm linked to Hunter Biden received over $130 million in federal bailout loans while Joe was vice president and routed profits through a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands, according to federal banking and corporate records.

The Bidens used connections with Ukraine and China to enrich themselves. The House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer chased down the ChiCom money trail to Biden family coffers. One of the million dollar payments went through a proxy associate of the Biden family and was divided among four family members; Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, Hallie Biden, and another account that probably went to Joe Biden. This was done to cover the tracks of where the money went.

They received a lot more than just one disbursed payment from China.  The Biden’s have considerable financial ties to Beijing.  And speaking of China, the ChiComs are emboldened by Biden’s incompetency and flaccid foreign policy. Their aggression keeps showing its ugly head with no reprisals.

The Bidens laundered money, committed tax evasion, and violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Their friendship and affairs with ChiCom spies should have resulted in several indictments.  They committed treason for profit. Hunter Biden’s laptop contains a mountain of evidence proving the family’s influence peddling and shady business deals.  The U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security released a report showing the impact of Biden family corruption on national security.

Joe Biden is ass deep in this.  Hunter was operating as a bagman for the ‘Big Guy’, collecting and funneling money to his father. Federal agents know they have sufficient evidence to charge the Bidens with felonies. The FBI and DOJ actively cover for the Bidens to protect them. The DOJ is politicized and rotten to the core with malfeasance. Merrick Garland who is as crooked as he is incompetent, refuses to investigate or press charges. The DNC pulls the strings.

The Bidens are a real crime syndicate.  The left wing media ignores this in favor of a contrived indictment against President Trump. They’re still distraught over the fact that he beat Hillary and she couldn’t continue Obama’s disastrous legacy.

 

 

Related article:

https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/laws-against-bribery-and-influence-peddling

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.com/biden-and-sons-deals-with-ukraine/

https://sfcmac.com/emails-reveal-bidens-influence-over-burisma-at-state-department/

1 thought on “Ex Obama Staffer: Biden’s ‘Malfeasance in Office’, Kickback Schemes, and Influence Peddling”

  1. John D. Egbert

    In re investigations/charges/trials: Listen to the crickets. Democrats are under the gun here; Republicans (read Trump) would be front page screaming 24-7.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial