Watch the video. They ambushed and shot him in the back and apparently, in the face.
Good going, fed thugs.
On Tuesday, the FBI and Oregon State Police pulled over nine militia members who had taken over a federal building in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge to protest the unjust jailing of Steven and Dwight Hammond. The militia members included outspoken anti-federal bureaucracy activists Ammon and Ryan Bundy, members of the Bundy clan that faced down the Environmental Protection Agency in Nevada last year.
……Officials had been waiting for an opportunity to arrest the group’s leadership away from the refuge to minimize the potential for violence, a senior law enforcement official told NBC News. The nine activists were traveling in two vehicles 45 miles outside of the refuge when the FBI and Oregon State Police pulled them over, the official said. Some tried to get away, then there was gunfire. Arizona rancher LaVoy Finicum, 54, was killed in the shooting, his daughter told NBC News. Ryan Bundy was injured, the official said. It was not year clear who fired the shots. Reportedly, Bundy and Finicum were the only two members of the group not to immediately surrender.
……Finicum’s daughter, Challice Finicum Finch, said that her father had told her he would not pull a gun first on law enforcement. “We all thought it would end, but not like this,” she said. “My dad did stress that they couldn’t pull a gun on them [officers] unless they pulled a gun. They were all committed to not firing on federal agents.” Filicum told NBC News on January 6, “There are things more important than your life, and freedom is one of them. I’m prepared to defend freedom.”
……The Bundys were supposed to meet with authorities at 6 p.m. in John Day, a nearby town; the shootings happened at 4:25 p.m. according to the FBI. Finicum told The Oregonian the day before his killing that “the tenor has changed, [law enforcement] have become more hardened…They’re doing all the things that show they want to take some kinetic action against us, and we’re saying, ‘Why be so unfriendly?’”
……it is worth noting the selective aggression of the federal government here. When college students take over government-owned buildings, the feds are nowhere to be found; the President of the United States justifies riots in places like Ferguson and Baltimore. If a few ranchers take over an empty federal building in the middle of nowhere, however, that’s worth drawing out the protesters and then risking a shooting.
As government grows larger, such run-ins will become more common. That’s particularly true when those targeted by the government have no association with an important political constituency.
The following is a history of government malfeasance and criminal intimidation of private land owners:
The Harney Basin (where the Hammond ranch is established) was settled in the 1870’s. The valley was settled by multiple ranchers and was known to have run over 300,000 head of cattle. These ranchers developed a state of the art irrigated system to water the meadows, and it soon became a favorite stopping place for migrating birds on their annual trek north.
(ab) In 1908 President Theodor Roosevelt, in a political scheme, create an “Indian reservation” around the Malheur, Mud & Harney Lakes and declared it “as a preserve and breeding ground for native birds”. Later this “Indian reservation” (without Indians) became the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.
(a) In 1964 the Hammonds’ purchased their ranch in the Harney Basin. The purchase included approximately 6000 acres of private property, 4 grazing rights on public land, a small ranch house and 3 water rights. The ranch is around 53 miles South of Burns, Oregon.
(a1) By the 1970’s nearly all the ranches adjacent to the Blitzen Valley were purchased by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and added to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge covers over 187,000 acres, stretches over 45 miles long and 37 miles wide. The expansion of the refuge grew and surrounds to the Hammond’s ranch. Approached many times by the FWS, the Hammonds refused to sell. Other ranchers also choose not to sell.
(a2) During the 1970’s the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), took a different approach to get the ranchers to sell. Ranchers were told: “grazing was detrimental to wildlife and must be reduced”; 32 out of 53 permits were revoked and many ranchers were forced to leave. Grazing fees were raised significantly for those who were allowed to remain. Refuge personnel took over the irrigation system claiming it as their own.
(a3) By 1980 a conflict was well on its way over water allocations on the adjacent privately owned Silvies Plain. The FWS wanted to acquire the ranch lands on the Silvies Plain to add to their already vast holdings. Refuge personnel intentionally diverted the water bypassing the vast meadow lands, directing the water into the rising Malheur Lakes. Within a few short years the surface area of the lakes doubled. Thirty-one ranches on the Silvies plains were flooded. Homes, corrals, barns and graze-land were washed a way and destroyed. The ranchers who once fought to keep the FWS from taking their land, now broke and destroyed, begged the FWS to acquire their useless ranches. In 1989 the waters began to recede; now the once thriving privately owned Silvies plains are a proud part of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge claimed by the FWS.
(a4) By the 1990’s the Hammonds were one of the very few ranchers who still owned private property adjacent to the refuge. Susie Hammond in an effort to make sense of what was going on began compiling facts about the refuge. In a hidden public record she found a study done by the FWS in 1975. The study showed the “no use” policies of the FWS on the refuge were causing the wildlife to leave the refuge and move to private property. The study showed the private property adjacent to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge produced four times more ducks and geese than the refuge. The study also showed the migrating birds were 13 times more likely to land on private property than on the refuge. When Susie brought this to the attention of the FWS and refuge personnel, her and her family became the subjects of a long train of abuses and corruptions.
(b) In the early 1990’s the Hammonds filed on a livestock water source and obtained a deed for the water right from the State of Oregon. When the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) found out the Hammonds obtained new water rights near the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge, they were agitated and became belligerent and vindictive toward the Hammonds. The US Fish and Wildlife Service challenged the Hammonds right to the water in an Oregon State Circuit Court. The court found the Hammonds legally obtained rights to the water in accordance to State law and therefore the use of the water belongs to the Hammonds.*
(c) In August 1994 the BLM & FWS illegally began building a fence around the Hammonds water source. Owning the water rights, and knowing that their cattle relied on that water source daily, the Hammonds tried to stop the building of the fence. The BLM & FWS called the Harney County Sheriff department and had Dwight Hammond (Father) arrested and charged with “disturbing and interfering with” federal officials or federal contractors (two counts, each a felony). Dwight spent one night in the Deschutes County Jail in Bend, and a second night behind bars in Portland. He was then hauled before a federal magistrate and released without bail. A hearing on the charges was postponed and the federal judge never set another date.
(d) The FWS also began restricting access to upper pieces of the Hammond’s private property. In order to get to the upper part of the Hammond’s ranch they had to go on a road that went through the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge. The FWS began barricading the road and threatening the Hammonds if they drove through it. The Hammonds removed the barricades and gates and continued to use their right of access. The road was proven later to be owned by the County of Harney. This further enraged the BLM & FWS.
(e) Shortly after the road & water disputes, the BLM & FWS arbitrarily revoked the Hammond’s upper grazing permit without any given cause, court proceeding or court ruling. As a traditional “fence out state” Oregon requires no obligation on the part of an owner to keep his or her livestock within a fence or to maintain control over the movement of the livestock. The Hammonds still intended to use their private property for grazing. However, they were informed a federal judge ruled, in a federal court, the federal government did not have to observe the Oregon fence out law. “Those laws are for the people, not for them”.
(f) The Hammonds were forced to either build and maintain miles of fences or be restricted from the use of their private property. Cutting their ranch in almost half, they could not afford to fence the land, so the cattle were removed.
(g) The Hammonds experienced many years of financial hardship due to the ranch being diminished. The Hammonds had to sell their ranch and home in order to purchase another property that had enough grass to feed their cattle. This property included two grazing rights on public land. Those were also arbitrarily revoked later.
(h) The owner of the Hammond’s original ranch passed away from a heart attack and the Hammonds made a trade for the ranch back.
(i) In the early fall of 2001, Steven Hammond (Son) called the fire department, informing them that he was going to be performing a routine prescribed burn on their ranch. Later that day he started a prescribed fire on their private property. The fire went onto public land and burned 127 acres of grass. The Hammonds put the fire out themselves. There was no communication about the burn from the federal government to the Hammonds at that time. Prescribed fires are a common method that Native Americans and ranchers have used in the area to increase the health & productivity of the land for many centuries.
(j) In 2006 a massive lightning storm started multiple fires that joined together inflaming the countryside. To prevent the fire from destroying their winter range and possibly their home, Steven Hammond (Son) started a backfire on their private property. The backfire was successful in putting out the lightning fires that had covered thousands of acres within a short period of time. The backfire saved much of the range and vegetation needed to feed the cattle through the winter. Steven’s mother, Susan Hammond said: “The backfire worked perfectly, it put out the fire, saved the range and possibly our home”.
(j1) The next day federal agents went to the Harney County Sheriff’s office and filled a police report making accusation against Dwight and Steven Hammond for starting the backfire. A few days after the backfire a Range-Con from the Burns District BLM office asked Steven if he would meet him in town (Frenchglen) for coffee. Steven accepted. When leaving he was arrested by the Harney County Sheriff Dave Glerup and BLM Ranger Orr. Sheriff Glerup then ordered him to go to the ranch and bring back his father. Both Dwight and Steven were booked and on multiple Oregon State charges. The Harney County District Attorney reviewed the accusation, evidence and charges, and determined the accusations against Dwight & Steven Hammond did not warrant prosecution and dropped all the charges.
(k) In 2011, 5 years after the police report was taken, the U.S. Attorney Office accused Dwight and Steven Hammond of completely different charges; they accused them of being “Terrorists” under the Federal Anti terrorism Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. This act carries a minimum sentence of five years in prison and a maximum sentence of death. Dwight & Steven’s mug shots were all over the news the next week posing them as “Arsonists”. Susan Hammond (Wife & Mother) said: “I would walk down the street or go in a store, people I had known for years would take extreme measures to avoid me”.
(l) Shortly after the sentencing, Capital Press ran a story about the Hammonds. A person who identified as Greg Allum posted three comments on the article, calling the ranchers “clowns” who endangered firefighters and other people in the area while burning valuable range land. Greg Allum, a retired BLM heavy equipment operator, soon called Capital Press to complain he had not made those comments and requested they be taken down from the website. Capital Press removed the comments. A search of the Internet Protocol address associated with the comments revealed the origin as the BLM’s office in Denver, Colorado. Allum said, he is friends with the Hammonds and he was alerted to the comments by neighbors who knew he wouldn’t have written them. “I feel bad for them. They lost a lot and they’re going to lose more,” Allum said of the ranchers. “They’re not terrorists”. “There’s this hatred in the BLM for them, and I don’t get it,” the retired BLM employee said. Jody Weil, deputy state director for communications at BLM’s Oregon office, indicated to reporters that if one of their agents falsified the comments, they would keep it private and not inform the public.
(m) In September 2006, Dwight & Susan Hammond’s home was raided. The agents informed the Hammonds they were looking for evidence that would connect them to the fires. The Hammonds later found out a boot print and a tire tracks were found near one of the many fires. No matching boots or tires were found in the Hammonds home or on their property. Susan Hammond (Wife) later said; ” I have never felt so violated in my life. We are ranchers not criminals”. Steven Hammond openly maintains his testimony that he started the backfire to save the winter grass from being destroyed and the backfire ended up working so well it put out the fire altogether.
(n) During the trial proceedings, Federal Court Judge Michael Hogan did not allow time for certain testimonies and evidence into the trail which would exonerate the Hammonds. Federal prosecuting attorney, Frank Papagni, was given full access for six days. He had ample time to use any evidence or testimony that strengthened the demonization of the Hammonds. The Hammonds attorney was only allowed 1 day. Many of the facts about the fires, land and why the Hammonds acted the way they did was not allowed into the proceedings and was not heard by the jury. Example: Judge Hogan did not allow time for the jury to hear or review certified scientific findings the fires improved the health and productivity of the land. Or, that the Hammonds had been subject to vindictive behavior by multiple federal agencies for years.
(o) Federal attorneys, Frank Papagni, hunted down a witness who was not mentally capable to be credible. Dusty Hammond (grandson and nephew) testified that Steven told him to start a fire. He was 13-years-old at the time, and 24-years-old when he testified (11 years later). At 24 Dusty had been suffering with mental problems for many years. He had estranged his family including his mother. Judge Hogan noted that Dusty’s memories as a 13-year-old boy were not clear or credible. However, Judge Hogan allowed the prosecution to continually use Dusty’s testimony. When speaking to the Hammonds about this testimony, they understood Dusty was manipulated and expressed nothing but love for their troubled grandson.
(p) Judge Michael Hogan & Frank Papagni tampered with the jury many times throughout the proceedings, including during the selection process. Hogan & Papagni only allowed people on the jury who did not understand the customs and culture of the ranchers or how land is used and cared for in the Diamond Valley. All of the jurors had to drive back and forth to Pendleton every day. Some drove more than two hours each way. By day 8 they were exhausted and expressed desires to be home.
On the final day, Judge Hogan kept pushing them to make a verdict. [Several times during deliberation, Judge Hogan pushed them to make a decision.] Judge Hogan also would not allow the jury to hear what punishment could be imposed upon an individual convicted as a terrorist under the 1996 act. The jury, not understanding the customs and cultures of the area and influenced by the prosecutors for six straight days, very exhausted, pushed for a verdict by the judge, unaware of the ramification of convicting someone as a terrorist, gave a verdict and went home.
(q) June 22, 2012, Dwight and Steven were found guilty of starting both the 2001 and the 2006 fires by the jury. However, the federal courts convicted them both as “Terrorists” under the 1996 Anti terrorism Act. Judge Hogan sentenced Dwight (Father) to 3 months in prison and Steven (son) to 12 months in federal prison. Both were also stipulated to pay $400,000 to the BLM. Judge Hogan overruling the minimum terrorist sentence, commented if the full five years were required it would be a violation of the 8th amendment (cruel and unusual punishment). The day of the sentencing Judge Hogan retired as a federal judge. In his honor the staff served chocolate cake in the courtroom.
(r) On January 4, 2013, Dwight and Steven reported to prison. They fulfilled their sentences, (Dwight 3 months, Steven 12 months). Dwight was released in March 2013 and Steven, January 2014.
(s) Sometime in June 2014, Rhonda Karges, Field Manager for the BLM, and her husband Chad Karges, Refuge Manager for the Malheur Wildlife Refuge (which surrounds the Hammond ranch), along with attorney Frank Papagni exemplified further vindictive behavior by filing an appeal with the 9th District Federal Court seeking Dwight’s and Steven’s return to federal prison for the entire 5 years.*
(t) In October 2015, the 9th District Court “re-sentenced” Dwight and Steven, requiring them to return to prison for several more years. Steven (46) has a wife and 3 children. Dwight (74) will leave Susan (74) to be alone after 55 years of marriage. If he survives, he will be 79 when he is released.
(u) During the court preceding the Hammonds were forced to grant the BLM first right of refusal; if the Hammonds ever sold their ranch they would have to sell it to the BLM.
(v) Dwight and Steven are ordered to report to federal prison again on January 4th, 2016 to begin their re-sentencing. Both their wives will have to manage the ranch for several years without them.
As you can see, the government mafia really went all out to railroad, bully, terrorize, and strong arm citizens who own private land, because the Nazis at the Bureau of Land Management are power hungry autocrats.
They pulled the same shit with rancher Clive Bundy, who stood up to the feds and won. The underlying motivation for the harassment against Bundy was criminal Harry Reid’s obsession with turning the land into a Chinese-funded solar energy farm.
This out-of-control federal government has gotten away with unconstitutional overreach for years. As civil liberties and rights are increasingly trampled, expect more of this.
9 thoughts on “FBI Shoots Oregon Rancher in the Back After Standoff Over Government Land, Water Grab”
This post has been here a couple of years but still, the guy that spent time with the BLM, based on what all I’ve closely kept up with (not from Oregon), and others more knowledgeable than I am, he sounds questionable. I do know since I was raised by a rancher that grazing is what you want cattle to do… keeps the vegetation from over growth. Unless you’d like to put up signs telling the them bovines not to eat the grass!! And yeah, those ranchers, miners and loggers are in it for profit. That’s how they make their living. I could be wrong and those folks are just being agitators and I’d be the first to admit it if I am but don’t think so. And you must be the only person on the planet who thinks the BLM plays nice or they don’t extort land from owners by whatever means all of which are illegal, or that they aren’t profiteers or squeeze land owners until they have no choice but to sell out…..guess who to!!!!! And them old BLM POSers ride off into the sunset singing, Another One Bites The Dust! Since a couple of years have gone by and that administration is gone 👏 maybe things will change with Draining The Swamp!!!
“And you must be the only person on the planet who thinks the BLM plays nice or they don’t extort land from owners by whatever means all of which are illegal, or that they aren’t profiteers or squeeze land owners until they have no choice but to sell out…”
What the hell?? If that’s the impression you got from my post you need to read it again. I am not a fan of the BLM. Far from it.
READ a more recent post: https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/01/08/all-charges-against-rancher-cliven-bundy-dismissed/
The FBI agents murdered Lavoy Finicum They should have been indicted.
The government has a history of malfeasance and criminal intimidation of private land owners. The government mafia really went all out to railroad, bully, terrorize, and strong arm citizens who own private land, because the Nazis at the Bureau of Land Management are power hungry autocrats.
Another factor that never gets discussed: The underlying motivation for the harassment against Bundy was criminal Harry Reid’s obsession with turning the land into a Chinese-funded solar energy farm.
The Bundy clan stood up to the government jackboots and won.
Sounds like the ” III rd Reich,” or actions of the American, ” NKVD,” (secret police of the former Soviet Union. The American Government has over reached the meaning of what our county is all about, “Freedom of the individual,” and our Constitutional rights. ” When the government fears the people, there is freedom, and when the people fear the government we have tyranny. does the shoe fit ?
back shooters how brave they are
Reblogged this on Debatable News: Mainstream to Tinfoil Hat and more.
That was a whole lot of bull. You must have gotten this info straight from the Bundy Ranch or Sheriff Mack. As someone that’s lived in the area for years and have had many dealings with BLM myself. I can tell you that the reasoning behind these standoffs are based on greed and greed alone, the greed of folks like the Bundys who only want the land so it can be destroyed by clearcutting, mining and grazing. They don’t want the land returned to “the people” it already belongs to the people and is maintained and protected by the government, these yahoos that took over the refuge want the land for themselves not for the people, they even stated in their demands that they wanted it to be made available to the ranchers, miners and loggers. This is all about profit, not rights.
The article was written by Ben Shapiro at the Daily Wire. A well-respected author and reputable publication.
You may have lived in the area for years, but you don’t know jack-shit about the BLM. The Bureau of Land Management is comprised of out of control jackbooted autocrats. Over the years, they’ve forced generations of ranchers off their property. It’s all about power and control. It has nothing to do with preserving lands “for the people”. It’s government greed and abuse of power. Period. The land taken by government goons is owned by the government, not “the people”. That should make you very angry and concerned about government overreach. If you own land the BLM wants, you run the risk of it being taken from you. You may not mind, but others do.
Speaking of greed, the underlying motivation for the harassment against Bundy was criminal Harry Reid’s obsession with turning the land into a Chinese-funded solar energy farm.
Whatever the Bundy’s and Hammonds do with THEIR land is none of the government’s goddamned business.
That’s why it’s called ‘private’ land, until the government strong arms the property away from the rightful owners.
You just don’t get it.
If you think the assassination of a rancher by the very government who encroached his property and his rights is justified, then you’re an idiot.
You’ll make a great eunuch for the new world order.
Reblogged this on hocuspocus13 and commented:
if you didn’t think that the gubmint bullys were gonna kill a citizen you’re a fookin’ idjit!!!
the fookin’ dept. of edjekation has purchased 52,000 shotguns…wattdahfook???…
If they werk fer the gubmint…
DON’T FUCKIN’ TRUST ‘EM!!!…
youse bin warned…jc