FBI’s Former General Counsel James Baker Believed Hillary Should Have Faced Criminal Charges, but was ‘Talked Out of It’

From John Soloman at The Hill

For most of the past three years, the FBI has tried to portray its top leadership as united behind ex-Director James Comey’s decision not to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for transmitting classified information over her insecure, private email server.

Although in the end that may have been the case, we now are learning that Comey’s top lawyer, then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, initially believed Clinton deserved to face criminal charges, but was talked out of it “pretty late in the process.”

The revelation is contained in testimony Baker gave to House investigators last year. His testimony has not been publicly released, but I was permitted to review a transcript.

During questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas), Baker was unequivocal about his early view that Clinton should face criminal charges.

“I have reason to believe that you originally believed it was appropriate to charge Hillary Clinton with regard to violations of law — various laws, with regard to mishandling of classified information. Is that accurate?” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, asked Baker.

Baker paused to gain his lawyer’s permission to respond, and then answered, “Yes.”

He later explained why he came to that conclusion, and how his mind was changed:

“So, I had that belief initially after reviewing, you know, a large binder of her emails that had classified information in them,” he said. “And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — she had the intent necessary to violate (the law).”

Asked when he was persuaded to change his mind, Baker said: “Pretty late in the process, because we were arguing about it, I think, up until the end.”

Baker made clear that he did not like the activity Clinton had engaged in: “My original belief after — well, after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials — I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged.”

His boss, Comey, announced on July 5, 2016, that he would not recommend criminal charges. He did so without consulting the Department of Justice, a decision the department’s inspector general (IG) later concluded was misguided and likely usurped the power of the attorney general to make prosecutorial decisions. Comey has said, in retrospect, he accepts that finding but took the actions he did because he thought “they were in the country’s best interest.”

Baker acknowledged that during the weeks leading up to the announcement, Comey “would throw things out like that to get people to start talking and thinking about it and test his conclusions.”

Baker said that if he had been more convinced there was evidence that Clinton intended to violate the law, “I would have argued that vociferously with him [Comey] and maybe changed his view.”

 

An Intel dump by the FBI shows the extent of Comey’s and Lynch’s Cover up of the Hillary email investigation.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on board her private jet in what was clearly a conflict of interest and a conversation on whether or not the DOJ would indict Hillary for her crimes.

After that, the fix was in.

By the way: Obama knew about her unsecure email and engaged in correspondence. And he lied about it. If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been blatant.

Lynch obstructed justice  and Comey abetted the entire thing.  They belong in jail right along with Hillary.

More:

Judicial Watch announced today it received 186 pages of records from the Department of Justice that include emails documenting an evident cover up of a chart of potential violations of law by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Potential??

 

 

Related post:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/09/03/the-rule-of-law-laws-are-for-little-people/

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
panduan menangkan jackpot maksimal di mahjong ways 2 manfaat mencapai jackpot besar mahjong ways 2 kenali fitur strategi terbaik mahjong ways buka peluang menguak keberuntungan di setiap spin mahjong ways 3 mulai dari nol hingga jackpot panduan taklukkan mahjong ways 2 rahasia sukses para pemain mahjong ways meraup cuan mahjong ways 2 mulai dari taruhan kecil hingga jackpot gede pgsoft mahjong ways menguasai permainan mencetak jackpot kilat teknik mahir main mahjong ways 2 dapat scatter hitam 5 tips rahasia gacor mahjong ways perlu kamu tahu kunci menang pola tersembuyi mahjong ways 2 cara gunakan keberuntungan rahasia spin santai di mahjong ways cara terbaik menang 5 langkah jitu menang mahjong ways optimalkan scatter hitam pahami scatter hitam mahjong ways cara maksimalkan kemenangan panduan gacor mahjong ways 2 teknik tepat menang besar cakar76 akun gacor pemain profesional cakar76 cakar76 cara raih jackpot mahjong wins 3 cakar76 cakar76 fitur baru pg soft mahjong ways 2 cuannya gak habis cakar76 game mahjong wins cakar76 kekayaan jackpot cakar76 inovasi desain mahjong win 3 grafis 3d memukau adkin88 adat88 pemain utama industri game indonesia mahjong adkin88 berbagi kebahagiaan jp puluhan juta mahjong ways 2 adat88 adkin88 cara efektif menang mahjong ways 2 jackpot adkin88 cara menang mahjong ways 2 strategi pola ajab pgsoft adkin88 fitur strategi terbaik mahjong ways 2 jackpot mahjong ways 2 kombinasi pola ritme putaran evaluasi gacor kisah pemain berhasil taklukkan rtp pgsoft mahjong ways teknik wild ganda mahjong ways 2 panduan lengkap