He’s certainly faithful to his constituency.
On Monday in Michigan, Obama became exercised when talking about the need to give even suspected terrorists legal rights.
“We may think this is Mohammed the terrorist,’’ he said at a campaign rally, but “it might be Mohammed the cab driver. You might think it’s Barack the bomb-thrower. But it might be Barack the guy running for president.’’
Continuing, he got more heated, his voice booming. Referring to the Constitution, he said: “Don’t mock the Constitution! Don’t make fun of it! Don’t suggest that it’s un-American to abide by what the founding fathers set up! It’s worked pretty well for 200 years!’’
He finished with a sigh: “These people.”
Mohammad the cab driver could have explosives in the trunk.
Barack the bomb thrower or Barack the candidate. What a choice.
And, that’s We the People to you, Obamessiah.
Don’t mock the Constitution? Has he ever read it? I must have missed the amendment which gives rights to foreign terrorists and enemy combatants. Maybe he plans on adding one in addition to the ’57 states’.
I’m one of those people who served this country as a Soldier for 30 years and was sworn to uphold the Constitution. I don’t need a lecture from a socialist who cares more for the ‘rights’ of Islamic terrorists than law-abiding American citizens.
While we’re on that subject, according to a recent Rasmussen Poll:
While 82% of voters who support McCain believe the justices should rule on what is in the Constitution, just 29% of Barack Obama’s supporters agree. Just 11% of McCain supporters say judges should rule based on the judge’s sense of fairness, while nearly half (49%) of Obama supporters agree.
So if a judge’s ‘sense of fairness’ doesn’t jive with the Constitution, that’s okay? Obama’s minions display such a good facade of concern over Constitutional rights. Too bad they wouldn’t know a real violation if it walked up with a bomb strapped to it.
5 thoughts on “Obama, Protecting the Rights of Terrorists Everywhere”
Release is not a choice I’d have made.
From a previous post:
Guess who helped him out? The same law firm who represented the Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners taken after the bloody battle at the Qala-I-Jangi fortress in Afghanistan.
The focus of these shysters is to draw attention away from the muslim atrocities and portray them as “innocent victims of Islamophobia” following 9/11. Forget the fact that the fuckers were caught after firefights, planting IEDs, or during sweeps of terrorist hideouts and strongholds.
The muslim shits like the “Kuwait 12” are poster boys for the ‘take no prisoners’ motto.
We A-bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki to bring the war in the Pacific to a halt. The Japanese got the message. BTW: They never did suffer the full consequence of atrocities like the Bataan Death March. They got off pretty easy. Same for the Germans. We used tactics in Germany like fire-bombing Dresden for 10 days. The Germans were finally defeated after we pummeled enough of them, but in light of the Holocaust and the way they treated American prisoners, they too, got off light.
You’re gonna have to divest yourself of the notion that we’re fighting an enemy that plays ‘fair’ or by the Marquis of Queensberry rules. They don’t have your liberal sensitivity and couldn’t care less about Geneva, much less find it on a map. Doesn’t do a whole lot of good when we’re the only ones expected to adhere to an obsolete, ineffectual ‘treaty’.
Just compare the lack of outrage over the beheadings, use of children and mentally retarded individuals as suicide bombers, and indiscriminate killings on the part of the muslims you sympathize with, to the hyperbolic bullshit being leveled at GITMO Soldiers trying to do their jobs. How’d ya like to endure getting feces and urine getting thrown on you as well as false accusations of ‘abuse’? That’s part of what those little muslim fucksticks do on a daily basis. Use your sympathy for people who deserve it, like the victims of the ‘peaceful religion of Islam’, past and present.
As for the Iraqis, (most of them are muslim) they should be grateful…that I wasn’t in charge.
Today is the 7th anniversay of 9/11. Remember who was responsible.
Only a leftwing moonbat would assign the same rights to enemy combatants and terrorists where none exist, especially in the Constitution. As for spreading freedom, killing Islamofascists hell bent on world conquest is part of that. The freedom from Islamic-based brutality.
Nah, Saddam put most of them in MASS GRAVES.
Since you’ve got your panties in a wad comparing treatment of prisoners: American troops and civilians captured by those poor misunderstood terrorists are beaten, tortured and beheaded, without benefit of ‘legal representation’.
Not a peep out of you liberal shitbags.
The Islamic thugs who earned their way into GITMO by committing heinous acts, usually complain about the AC turned up too high, not getting a second helping of Falafel, not enough recreation time, or worn-out prayer mats.
A lot of them don’t want to leave.
Those that do, usually pick up where they left off.
FUCK imprisoning them; take them out and shoot them. Then, we wouldn’t have to listen to the incessant whining from liberal shitbirds who care more about the ‘treatment’ of ruthless Islamic cutthroats than innocent victims. (READ: INFIDELS).
Allah U Fuckbar.
The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the – Web Reconnaissance for 09/10/2008 A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often.
Yeah and they were all “Islamic thugs who earned their way into GITMO by commiting heinous acts”. That is why we have released hundreds of them with no charges. Many of them were just people picked up for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The vast majority of them did not fire a shot at American troops.
The Japanese and Germans, NV and Koreans abused our troops also. But we are better than them. Are you so ignorant that you would have us reduce ourselves to the level of the “savages” who you say we are opposing? (silly question, clearly you are) You would have us just shoot civilians? And then I bet you would accuse the Iraqis of being ungrateful for our “help” eh?
Only an idiot would think that blindly imprisoning anyone for an indefinite period with no legal access and no charges brought is “spreading freedom”. You can’t talk about spreading freedom while you are behaving like a tyrant. You know who else just imprisoned people? Saddam Hussein.
Amazing how much you rightard whack jobs hate the constitution.