We voted for this . Rogue judges have just been reined in from seizing executive power through bogus nationwide injunctions. This is a huge win for the American people.
In a historic decision, the United States Supreme Court delivered a powerful rebuke of activist judges and handed President Trump a pivotal legal victory on Friday.
The decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., reaffirms the rightful balance of power between the judiciary and the executive, curbing the ability of unelected district judges to paralyze the will of a duly elected president.
In a 6–3 decision, the Court sided with the Trump administration, ruling that federal district courts lack the constitutional or statutory authority to issue so-called ‘universal injunctions’ — sweeping orders that block government policies nationwide, often at the request of left-wing advocacy groups.
The case stemmed from challenges to President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order No. 14160, titled Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship (90 Fed. Reg. 8449, 2025).
This bold order sought to clarify the scope of birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, addressing long-standing concerns about its misapplication to those not fully “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.
Predictably, liberal strongholds in Maryland, Washington, and Massachusetts saw district courts issue universal injunctions, attempting to block the order’s enforcement not just for the plaintiffs but for everyone, everywhere.
These injunctions, cheered by open-borders advocates and far-left elites, threatened to derail a policy aimed at safeguarding the integrity of American citizenship.
Shockingly, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, dismantled the legal foundation of these injunctions with surgical precision.
Joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, Barrett declared that such “universal” remedies lack any historical basis in the equitable traditions of the Judiciary Act of 1789.
In contrast, the liberal justices — Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson — issued fiery dissents dripping with ideological panic. Jackson even suggested the ruling could inflict a “mortal wound” on the Constitution.
The Court stopped short of ruling on the constitutionality of the executive order itself, but the implications are massive.
By gutting the lower court’s ability to halt implementation nationwide, the path is now clear for the Trump administration to enforce its definition of birthright citizenship.
Leftwing activist judges are being grabbed by the scuff of the neck and dragged back to the law and the constitution. They cannot usurp the executive office. We have checks and balances, not a royal judiciary that can overrule We the People.
……The 6-3 ruling along ideological lines found that three federal district judges went too far in issuing nationwide injunctions against Trump’s order. The decision hobbles a key tool used by venue-shopping Democrats and the activist judges that have been blocking Trump’s path since January – with every court having found the legality of Trump’s EO ‘likely’ unconstitutional.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was specifically called out for being retarded…
That said, it doesn’t definitively resolve whether Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship are constitutional – a question which could end up in front of the Supremes down the road. It does, however, narrow the lower court rulings to only block Trump’s order as applied to the 22 Democratic-led states, expectant mothers and immigration organizations that are suing.
Jackson is a real piece of work.
She’s “not a biologist“, so she has no idea how to define a woman. She insists child pornographers aren’t pedophiles. One of the perverts she slapped on the wrist for processing child porn, thanked her profusely for the 3 month sentence.
Another pedo she was soft on is an Oklahoma public school teacher named Lucas William Cane, who distributed thousands of child porn images on the Internet. Cane posted 23 cloud storage links containing more than 6,500 pictures and videos ‘depicting children who appeared to be of elementary, middle, and high school ages engaged in sexual acts or posing sexually.’ Some children appearing alone, with adults or with other children engaged in various sex acts.” Jackson gave the shitbag the mandatory minimum, 60 months in prison, instead of the 84 months that’d been requested by prosecutors.
The scrunt also went easy on child-porn cases that involved horrifying details of sadomasochistic torture of young kids — including infants and toddlers.
The Dems pushed this DEI hire through confirmation because Joe Biden promised to appoint a black female the the SCOTUS.
She checked the boxes.
She is not qualified to sit on any bench, let alone the SCOTUS.
The SCOTUS also ruled that kids shouldn’t be forced to read queer story books.
The Supreme Court sided Friday with parents seeking to opt their children out of required LGBTQ storybook lessons.
In an 6-3 ruling, the majority held that parents are likely to succeed in their claim that the school board’s decision violates their First Amendment rights.
“The Board’s introduction of the ‘LGBTQ+-inclusive’ storybooks, along with its decision to withhold opt outs, places an unconstitutional burden on the parents’ rights to the free exercise of their religion,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion. “The parents have therefore shown that they are likely to succeed in their free exercise claims. They have likewise shown entitlement to a preliminary injunction pending the completion of this lawsuit.”
Birthright citizenship has been abused by illegals aliens for decades. They come here, squat and drop children, and assume that gives the whole family citizenship.
That has come to an end.
In the first of several monumental decisions expected, SCOTUS handed President Donald Trump a critical win in his quest to rein in birthright citizenship.
In a 6-3 ruling on Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court voted to narrow nationwide injunctions that had previously hampered Trump on a number of issues — including the birthright citizenship issue.
The three female liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, all dissented.
……..While this is undoubtedly a win for the Trump administration, the actual issue of birthright citizenship is still somewhat in the air.
The majority opinion did leave open the door that Trump’s birthright citizenship overhaul could still be found illegal.
“Nothing we say today resolves the distinct question whether the Administrative Procedure Act authorizes federal courts to vacate federal agency action,” Barrett wrote.
…….Regardless, Barrett made clear that what these lower courts were doing in response to what they perceived as illegal acts by Trump was not right.
“When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too,” she wrote.
Rep. Andy Barr, R-Ky., is introducing a constitutional amendment to “immediately put an end to this debate” by clarifying that children of illegal immigrants are not eligible for citizenship. If passed, Barr’s amendment would clarify the meaning of the 14th Amendment’s clause that persons must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States to be citizens.
The 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 to guarantee citizenship rights to former slaves, states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
……Barr’s amendment would clarify that “a person born in the United States may only be considered ‘subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’ if the person is born in the United States of parents, one of whom is — (1) a national of the United States; (2) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States whose residence is in the United States; or (3) an alien with lawful status under the immigration laws performing active service in the armed forces.”
This comes as the Supreme Court on Friday delivered a major victory in President Donald Trump’s quest to block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions that had upended many of his administration’s executive orders and actions, including his order ending birthright citizenship.
Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts to issue injunctions only in limited instances. However, the ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case.
It was a good day for MAGA.
Seems to me that mass arrests/trials for insurrection are in order — and not just for the “judges,” but those who got them started, too . . .