Harry Potter and the Gratuitous Gay

J.K. Rowling, author of the Hary Potter series, has “outed” one of the main characters:

Harry Potter fans, the rumors are true: Albus Dumbledore, master wizard and Headmaster of Hogwarts, is gay.

J.K. Rowling, author of the mega-selling fantasy series that ended last summer, outed the beloved character Friday night while appearing before a full house at Carnegie Hall. After reading briefly from the final book, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” she took questions from audience members.

She was asked by one young fan whether Dumbledore finds “true love.”

“Dumbledore is gay,” the author responded to gasps and applause.


Gasps and applause. Good gawd. Sooner or later the closet just has to get flung open, doesn’t it? I’m not a big Potter fan, although Daniel Radcliffe is as cute as the dickens, but this is just the lastest in token “diversity” and it’s worn thin. Aren’t their any straight people left in literature or the entertainment industry?

Dumbledore has joined the ranks of the other political undertones of Rowling’s stories:

Perhaps this is why Alfonso Cuarón won’t be directing any more Harry Potter movies: he’s compared the über-evil series villain Lord Voldemort to George W Bush.

Given the current culture of paranoia in the States, Cuarón’s comments are likely to cause a stir. The “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” director told Newsweek that Voldemort reminds him of both Bush and Saddam Hussein: “They both have selfish interests and are very much in love with power,” he said. “Also, a disregard for the environment. A love for manipulating people.”

And the political comparisions don’t stop there: “I read books four and five, and [Minister of Magic] Fudge is similar to Tony Blair. He’s the ultimate politician. He’s in denial about many things. And everything is for the sake of his own persona, his own power. The way the Iraq thing was handled was not unlike the way Fudge handled affairs in book four.”


Didja get that? The limeys think we have a ‘culture of paranoia’. Yeah, let’s just all calm down. The terrorists are nothing to worry about. 3000 dead people and a world-wide campaign of homicide bombings, beheadings, and anti-Western hate speech in the name of Allah, isn’t enough to ’cause a stir’. All we have to worry about is Cuarón’s fatuous comparisons of a fictional evil sorcerer to President Bush. Wow.  Talk about paranoid.  Maybe GW can cast an evil spell on the little twit and turn him into a “Quaffle” ball.

Another ‘interpretive’ comparison, this time by a Slate columnist:

What is J.K. Rowling up to here? Is she criticizing the War on Terror or simply using it as a plot device? In some scenes, she does take jabs at the Bush and Blair administrations. The Ministry of Magic’s security pamphlet, for example, recalls the much-scorned program: “Should you feel that a family member, colleague, friend or neighbor is acting in a strange manner, contact the Magical Law Enforcement Squad at once.” And Harry has a telling confrontation with the Minister of Magic, who thinks that in the battle against Voldemort, perceptions matter most. “If you were to be seen popping in and out of the Ministry from time to time,” he tells Harry, “that would give the right impression. … It would give everyone a lift to think you were more involved.” Harry refuses. He doesn’t want to endorse the ministry when it’s sending innocent men to Azkaban—the wizard penitentiary that becomes, in this installment, a stand-in for Gitmo. “It’s your duty to check that people really are Death Eaters before you chuck them in prison,” Harry says.


Let’s see: Reference to nazi-era snitches, check. Sympathetic nod to the muslim terrorist gutterslugs at GITMO, check.  Rowling sure covers all the usual leftwingnut bases. But hey, at least she got kids interested in reading again, right?

2 thoughts on “Harry Potter and the Gratuitous Gay”

  1. Ugh…can’t find your email contact info right now. Hope this isn’t inappropriate, but I covered much of this topic in a post called Republican’s for Voldemort on my blog…http://thunderrun.blogspot.com/2007/09/republicans-for-voldemort.html

    According to Rowling the analogies that Alfonso Cuarón makes are completely off base.

    Dave, it’s not off base at all, and you may post anytime.
    This quote from your blog sums it up:

    For anyone that has ever met George W. Bush, listened to him speak or read his words, this is as far from a description of George W. Bush than ever there was. In point of fact this description of Voldemort is more in line with a description of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Osama bin Laden than Bush. Only someone so convinced in Bush as Evil Emperor could equate Voldemort with Bush. Voldemort then can not be George W. Bush but has to be those “petty dictators” and megalomaniac fundamentalist tyrants that currently terrorize the world with their suicide bombers and medieval thinking.

    Bush represents everything the leftwing cannot stomach; love of country, the guts to stick with his decisions, strong principles, and the courage to fight back against real evil entities that just happen to coincide with everything the left admires: communism, Islamofascism, increased taxation, and the creation of a welfare state. What’s really amusing is that they credit George Bush with super-human powers that run the gamit from hurricanes to running the world through mind control. It’s as funny as it is pathetic.


    “Dumbledore is gay.” With all due respect to the author, how can he be anything? He’s DEAD!! D’ya think that just maybe Ms. Rowling was having a little joke at the fan — who should have known better than to ask such an obviously inane question, regardless of his age.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial