Obama: ‘Victory Not a Goal in Afghanistan’

As an Iraq war veteran, I’m so glad this milksop wasn’t in charge on 9/11. He would have apologized to Bin Laden and blamed America for goading the ‘peaceful’ muslims into attacking our country. 2012 cannot come soon enough.

Obama has put securing Afghanistan near the top of his foreign policy agenda, but “victory” in the war-torn country isn’t necessarily the United States’ goal, he said Thursday in a TV interview.

Obambi once again demonstrates his total ignorance of historical facts:

“I’m always worried about using the word ‘victory,’ because, you know, it invokes this notion of Emperor Hirohito coming down and signing a surrender to MacArthur,” Obama told ABC News.

Emperor Hirohito did NOT sign the surrender. That was done by military officers on both sides.
And for god’s sake, let’s get our panties in a wad over the concept of “victory”, especially in wartime. We might hurt someone’s feelings, and I’d have to apologize’.
Gawd, what a dumb fuck. I wonder if he realizes just how stupid he sounds.

The enemy facing U.S. and Afghan forces isn’t so clearly defined, he explained.

“We’re not dealing with nation states at this point. We’re concerned with Al Qaeda and the Taliban, Al Qaeda’s allies,” he said. “So when you have a non-state actor, a shadowy operation like Al Qaeda, our goal is to make sure they can’t attack the United States.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/23/obama-victory-necessarily-goal-afghanistan/

The enemy clearly defines themselves as Islamic jihadists, whether Taliban, Al Qaeda, or Hamas. The Islamic nation-states across the Middle East, produce these fuckers.
How do you plan on making sure they ‘can’t attack the United States’ without defeating them on their on turf, jackass? The terminology has been changed from ‘war on terrorism’ to “overseas contingency operations”. It must be a ‘kinder, gentler’ war.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial