This Philly cop threatened retired cops and their families who voted for Trump saying “You will be the subject of whooping, stop and frisk– and ultimately shot.”
The Philadelphia Police gave a statement saying they’re ‘investigating’.
This is the ‘cop’:
Lots of junk in the trunk:
Posing with Hildabeast:
A list of things she thinks cops shouldn’t do:
More information:
In 2009, she accidentally discharged her firearm in a police station when she was showing it off to a new recruit.
Himmons was sued by another female officer who was subjected to racial discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation.
From the court case:
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Joy Gallen-Ruiz (Caucasian, female) was employed as a police officer for the City of Philadelphia since April 2000. Around January 1, 2006, she came under the direct supervision of defendant Robin Himmons (African-American, female) (“Sgt. Himmons”), who in turn reported to defendant Marty King (African-American, male) (“Lt. King”) as lieutenant of the 12th Police District. Plaintiff claims that on January 26, 2006, she submitted papers applying for a transfer to the Accident Investigation Division (“AID”). (Compl. ¶¶ 19, 20.) The next day, plaintiff requested, and was granted, vacation time from an on-duty supervisor, but was then berated by Sgt. Himmons for not having obtained her approval first. On February 4, 2006, Sgt. Himmons and Lt. King asked plaintiff to sign non-disciplinary “training memos,” at which point plaintiff apparently sought union representation. (Id. ¶ 21.) On February 6, 2006, plaintiff approached Union Officer Roosevelt Poplar about her concerns regarding the training memos, and regarding her belief that she was being subjected to discrimination. (Id. ¶ 57.) Plaintiff alleges that Sgt. Himmons then conditioned the approval of plaintiff’s AID transfer application on plaintiff’s signing of the training memoranda. (Id. ¶ 21.)
About one week later on February 10, 2006, plaintiff was assigned an eight-day foot beat in cold weather, during which she was directed not to take breaks or sit down. She also alleges that she was assigned a “12T1” corner some time during this eight-day period, which she claims no other officer has been assigned. (Id.) On February 20, 2006, plaintiff submitted additional application papers, this time requesting a transfer to the 16th Police District, which she claims were “lost” twice and had to be re-submitted on March 1, 2006 and March 9, 2006. On March 5, 2006, plaintiff reported to Lt. King that she observed Sgt. Himmons sleeping on the job. She claims that thereafter, Sgt. Himmons changed plaintiff’s car assignments, called her a “f___ing white b-tch,” and attempted to change her locker assignment.
On March 9, 2006, plaintiff was given an unsatisfactory performance review by Sgt. Himmons. A little over a week later on March 21, 2006, plaintiff’s transfer request to the 16th Police District was granted, effective March 23, 2006. That same day, plaintiff was allegedly contacted by the Police Department’s EEO Unit and asked to “drop the EEO complaint [because] you got what you want.” (Id.) The timing and substance of this EEO complaint, however, are unclear, as are plaintiff’s general averments that she reported to Lt. King about “having problems” with Sgt. Himmons which she believed “w[ere] due to race and/or sex.” (Id. ¶ 23.) Plaintiff goes on to assert that, around March 28, 2006, Sgt. Himmons “screamed and hollered” at her, (Id. ¶ 21), and further punched her on April 27, 2006 in the presence of two other officers. (Id. ¶ 29.) According to plaintiff, Sgt. Himmons’ actions were motivated not only by racial animus, but also by the fact that plaintiff was a witness for another female employee who had filed an EEO sexual harassment complaint against a previous supervisor. (Id. ¶¶ 22, 28.)
Although not mentioned in her complaint, plaintiff states in her Response in Opposition that she complained to the Police Department’s EEO Unit of race/gender discrimination soon after she received her unsatisfactory performance review on March 9, 2006.
DEI hire, for sure.