Ten of the Most Deranged College Courses This Year

This give you a good idea of what passes for modern education in universities.  Parents who cut the checks for this garbage should rethink their priorities.

From Lone Conservative


1. Oberlin College – How to Win a Beauty Pageant: Race, Gender, Culture, & U.S. National Identity

“This course examines US beauty pageants from the 1920s to the present. Our aim will be to analyze pageantry as a unique site for the interplay of race, gender, class, sexuality, and nation. We will learn about cultural studies methodology, including close reading, cultural history, critical discourse analysis, and ethnography, and use those methods to understand the changing identity of the US over time. This course includes a field visit to a pageant in Ohio.”

This is a well-known and often ridiculed course. When classes like these are mocked in the media over and over again, colleges often stop offering the course, or at least re-title the courses to something less flamboyant. It says something about Oberlin that they’re sticking to their guns—we just don’t know exactly what.


2. Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) – Transracial Bodies, Transracial Selves

“Technological advances in surgery, hormonal therapy, psychiatry, [and] cultural warfare are catching up to the transgender presence: the gendered body is not necessarily that with which we were born, but one that can be crafted to match the real body of our psyche, our dreams. Blackness, Whiteness, Asianness, Latinness, the whole rainbow of racial identification, is still construed as biologically inescapable and inevitable. the often negative reaction to transracialism is contrary to the everyday experience that actually finds racial identification as a process that is always transracial. Declaring ourselves racially, we all cross restricted zones in becoming ourselves. In this course, we will use the discourse of transgenderism to build an alternate vocabulary of race.”

Transgenderism was a dubious notion before the public was bombarded with its normalization via media and academia. Is RISD leading the way for the normalization of changing races? Cutting edge stuff. Call Rachel Dolezal!


3. Stanford University – Love as a Force for Social Justice

“This course will explore the concept of agape love (compassion/kindness) as a force for social justice and action and as the inspiration for service and the application of knowledge to positive social change. Biological, psychological, religious, and social perspectives of love will be discussed, drawing on the expertise of people from a variety of disciplines.”

*Conga drums will be provided for the kumbaya in the park.


4. UCLA – Queering American History

“History of sexual and gender minorities in U.S. Topics include changing norms, romantic friendships, medical discourse, liberation politics, post-Stonewall culture, AIDS, transgender movement, queer theory, and politics.”

This course description actually seems relatively normal, though the action verb in the title suggests that there may be some historical revision taking place. And how does one make history gay? The world will hopefully never know.


5. Swarthmore College – Sex, Gender, and the Bible

“The first two chapters of the biblical book of Genesis offer two very different ancient accounts of the creation of humanity and the construction of gender. The rest of the book of Genesis offers a unique portrayal of family dynamics, drama and dysfunction, full of complex and compelling narratives where gender is constantly negotiated and renegotiated. In this class, we will engage in close readings of primary biblical sources and contemporary feminist and queer scholarship about these texts, as we explore what the first book of the Bible says about God, gender, power, sexuality, and family values.”

“And on the eighth day, God created the other 54 genders.”


6. Brown University – Feminist Theory for a Heated Planet

“The ecological crises – the “sixth extinction,” “global warming,” “the eruption of Gaia” – have forced many humans to challenge contingent boundaries drawn in more or less compelling ways in the Western world. Dualisms opposing nature to culture, the human and the nonhuman, the natural and the technological, the feminine and the masculine, seem more destabilized than ever. When geologists came up with a new epoch called the “Anthropocene,” feminist theory was well equipped to problematize this allegedly omnipotent “anthropos.” Reciprocally, queer, post-colonial, and feminist theories have re-thought the never so normative, hardly stable, greatly unknown, nature of nature.”

This is my personal favorite. I haven’t the slightest idea as to what what will be taught, but Gaia will be there. Maybe Cthulhu too. Great networking opportunities.


7. University of Chicago – Gendering Privacy

“Interest in privacy has surged in recent decades in light of the emergence of Big Data, the rise of increasingly sophisticated methods of surveillance, and the ubiquity of networked social media in everyday life. Yet privacy remains a notoriously slippery concept to pin down—across disciplines, privacy has been conceptualized variously as a legal right, a psychological state of being, a set of preferences, and a boundary-making process. In this course, we take a sociological approach to privacy, starting with the notion that privacy is at once a decidedly “micro” individual phenomenon and at the same time a product of “macro” social-structural forces. Thus, while privacy preferences can vary from person to person, the capacity to achieve privacy is shaped by social position (e.g., race, class, gender, etc.). In this course, we focus specifically on how women and men experience possibilities for privacy and how these experiences are shaped by their racial and class location. We will draw on a range of theoretical perspectives, including feminist theory, critical legal theory, and critical race theory to examine privacy through the lens of social inequality. Empirically, we will investigate how the twin systems of welfare and criminal justice present challenges to privacy for men and women living in poverty. The main questions guiding our inquiry include: Who gets to have privacy (and who doesn’t), why, and at what costs?”

Is privacy sexist? Do men possess more institutional privacy than women? Do poor men have more or less privacy than rich men? What about the privation of the privacy of military private’s privates? These are some of the colorful questions to be discussed in this section.


8. Columbia University – Sex, Aesthetics & Capitalism

“How can performances, theatrical texts, and other art/media objects illuminate the operations of gender, sexuality, and race in global capitalism? Drawing from a range of artistic media and critical traditions, we explore how aesthetic thought can help us analyze the sexual, racial, and national character of contemporary labor and life.”

Women are oppressed by Capitalism, because Star Wars and Shakespeare say so. A great preparation for reorganizing the funding structure of a company or performing robotic surgery.


9.  Swarthmore College – Queering God

“The God of the Bible and later Jewish and Christian literature is distinctively masculine, definitely male. Or is He? If we can point out places in traditional writings where God is nurturing, forgiving, and loving, does that mean that God is feminine, or female? This course examines feminist and queer writings about God, explores the tensions between feminist and queer theology, and seeks to stretch the limits of gendering-and sexing-the divine. Key themes include: gender; embodiment; masculinity; liberation; sexuality; feminist and queer theory.”

Some Swarthmore students will be spending a semester debating whether or not God is female. Here’s my question: if, after many hours of scholarly research and intense debate, the class concludes that God is a woman, how will they get the word out? She’ll just be systemically oppressed and silenced.


10. UC-Santa Barbara – Feminist Theories of Science and Feminist Scientists

“Exploration of feminists analyses and critiques of science in social, historical, and political contexts. How does science construct gender? How and why are women excluded from scientific discourses and practices? How have women transformed science, and what is “feminist science?”

Alternate course title suggestion:  “Science is Wrong! #woke #educated.”


Bonus: Princeton University – Trumpland

“We will examine conspiracy theory, rural atomization, truth claims, and racial identity politics in light of ‘Trump-ist’ politics, and seek to chart its path forward in an increasingly destabilized political terrain,” [we] will introduce students to critical theory on race (especially whiteness), conspiracy, authoritarianism, and democracy. [We will also explore] America’s deindustrialization, white identity politics, nationalism, populism, and a new ‘post-truth’ relationship with the media.”

Inspired by Van Jones’ “whitelash” comments, this class will seek to impart on its students the idea that racist white people elected Trump. Here’s a map showing that the same swing counties that elected Obama also elected Trump. You’re welcome, Princeton students. Pay close attention to the counties in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida.


Leftwing-induced cultural fascism has metastasized on American universities.

The current rampage of black thug activists (‘Black Lives Matter) and white liberal spoiled brats is a culmination of years of leftwing indoctrination poured into the malleable skulls of college students. Most of them have never been independent or self-reliant.  Their world centers around sophomoric narratives and SJW drivel. “Safe spaces” from  “microaggression” have become the norm. Just wait until these little snowflakes graduate, get out into the real world, and find out that no employer in their right mind will cater to their wild-assed fantasies.

Learning, healthy skepticism, courage of conviction and thoughtful analysis of the world have been gutted for a more dumbed-down, spineless, unprincipled,  nihilist approach.

Thanks to the fatuous indoctrination of left wing academic intelligentsia, college campuses have morphed into a petri dish of bat-shit crazy dysfunction. Once these little snowflakes get out into the real world and try to get jobs, they will get a rude awakening when they find out that employers will not pander to their ‘feelz’ and unearned sense of entitlement. The administrations and faculty at these universities are fostering this kind of insanity by encouraging violent, infantile behavior. How ironic that the Free Speech Movement, which was started by left wing radicals on university campuses in the 1960s, against the ‘oppressive establishment’, has now become the oppressive establishment. Learning, healthy skepticism, courage of conviction and thoughtful analysis of the world have been gutted for a more dumbed-down, spineless, unprincipled, nihilist approach. Just the very act of rebelling against or challenging the agenda and the tactics of students who arrive at the college already radicalized, will get you death threats and social media hate speech. The inmates are running the asylum.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial