From NBC News, a commentary piece arguing that voting for Trump is unconstitutional. Discusses legal remedies. 'Censuring' individual voters would be 'difficult.' Nullifying election even harder. Still, other possibilities… https://t.co/Wtss6b2FZO pic.twitter.com/Voc3Lnbd5l
— Byron York (@ByronYork) January 18, 2020
Berlatsky’s unhinged mental state is on full display. His entire diatribe is based on hackneyed claims of “racist” voters—a label usually assigned to people who refuse to goosestep to the liberal narrative—and devising ways to strip citizens of voting privileges based on rewriting the constitution to suit his politics. He cites the opinions of a leftwing professor as support for this:
……Terry Smith, a visiting professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, offers a different response in his new book, “Whitelash: Unmasking White Grievance at the Ballot Box.” Rather than excuse racist voters or try to figure out how to live with their choices, he argues that racist voting is not just immoral, but illegal. The government, Smith says, has the ability, and the responsibility, to address it.
Smith points out that racist appeals in union elections are illegal and that an election in which one side uses racist appeals can be invalidated by the National Labor Relations Board. Similarly, in the 2016 case Peña v. Rodriguez, the Supreme Court ruled that when a juror expresses overt bigotry, the jury’s verdict should be invalidated.
……”When voters go to the booth, they’re not expressing a mere personal preference,” Smith told me. According to Smith, voters who pull the levers to harm black people are violating the Constitution. If the Constitution means that overt racist appeals undermine the legality of union elections, it stands to reason that they undermine the legality of other elections, as well.
……”I think we can dismantle some of the features of the electoral system that encourage radicalized decision-making,” he says. “For instance, you only get a partisan gerrymander by moving people in and out of districts on the basis of their race.” Ending this practice at the state and federal levels would be a big step toward reducing the power of racism at the ballot box, as would ending the use of Voter IDs intended to disenfranchise black voters.
In other words: Smith wants to extend ‘discrimination’ laws to votes he deems as “racist” and he doesn’t like the personal preferences of voters he abhors.
In this country, a valid ID is required to buy cigarettes and alcohol, to get a library card, pick up prescriptions at pharmacies, to open a bank account, purchase and drive a car, get married, apply for a job, buy a home, and apply for loans.
He thinks blacks are too stupid to get IDs and comply with voting laws like everyone else.
Voters should be criminalized for their choices:
Politicians and pundits, Republican and Democratic alike, have been unwilling to reprimand voters or hold them accountable. But voters are not well-intentioned innocents who are helplessly manipulated by malevolent leaders. They make important decisions as constitutional actors, for which they have moral responsibility.
Berlatsky has a long standing hatred of whites.
Whiteness. The bane of self-loathing liberal leukophobes.
No one does hate speech and racism like the Left. They spew misogynist hatred toward female conservatives, fling racial slurs at black and white Republican/Tea Party members and hurl psychotic death wishes at all three for good measure.
These are the voters Berlatsky favors:
Berlatsky and his professor friend should try to explain their theories to these voters:
Oh, and the little snowflake is crying over the responses:
They hurt his feelz and he needs money. How awful.
When President Trump is re-elected this year, you can count on a liberal meltdown that will be nuclear in comparison to 2016.
The Dems and their media tools are the biggest hate group on the planet. Their political platform involves hate, rage, and bigotry. But they’re liberal bigots, so it’s okay.
Liberals are the fascists they warned us about.